<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ordinary Attention</title>
    <description>Philosophy for the public</description>
    <link>https://ordinaryattention.com/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://ordinaryattention.com/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    <item>
      <title>Ordinary observation: my two cents on using LLMs</title>
      <link>https://ordinaryattention.com/posts/2026-08-19-ordinary-observation-my-two-cents-on-using-llms/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ordinaryattention.com/posts/2026-08-19-ordinary-observation-my-two-cents-on-using-llms/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Qian Wang</dc:creator>
      <description>One day, out of curiosity, I sent Claude (Opus 4.8) a question: ‘Is your way of thinking purely reasoning, logical or mathematical?’ It gave me five paragraphs of answer as it usually does. In short, it says mechanically it’s mathematics, in character though it’s more like pattern completion. What caught my attention in the long answer is the sentence saying ‘…when I write out step-by-step reas...</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
